Prove process compliance without the quarter-end scramble
"Are we compliant?" shouldn't take three weeks and a war room to answer. Compliance drift and policy-process gaps surface in audits as findings, remediation cost and reputational exposure, because the evidence is reconstructed under pressure instead of held ready. IGX360 maps your policies to the processes and controls that enforce them, so the answer is standing evidence, not a scramble.
Check your audit-readinessWhy audit prep becomes a scramble
Audit prep is a scramble because the answer to "are we compliant" is reconstructed from scratch under time pressure, by people who also have a day job, not because the drift itself is unusual. That reconstruction, done fast and under pressure, is where errors and omissions creep in.
What auditors actually want: policies mapped to controls, mapped to evidence
Auditors rely on what you can prove, not what you intend. A policy states intent; a control is the activity that enforces it; evidence shows the control ran. Audit-readiness means those three are linked and current. A short readiness check:
- Every obligation maps to a control. A specific, testable control, not an assumption that "we do that somewhere."
- Every control maps to a process. A control not tied to the process it governs can't be shown to actually run.
- Every control has an owner. A control with no named owner will fail at audit.
- Coverage gaps are visible. You can see which policies govern which processes, and where no control exists at all.
IGX360 maps this coverage across your model, scores audit-readiness, and shows where the gaps sit, so evidence is assembled continuously instead of reconstructed at quarter-end.
Which frameworks this applies to
The model is framework-neutral: you map your own policies and obligations to processes, so it works whether you're evidencing SOC 2, ISO 27001, FCA obligations, or an internal control framework. It complements your GRC or assurance tooling, it shows where your processes do and don't cover your obligations; it doesn't replace evidence-collection tooling.
Questions worth asking before you commit
Does this replace our GRC tool?
No. It maps your processes to policies and controls and shows where coverage is missing; it complements assurance tooling.
How is "audit-ready by construction" different?
Every answer carries its source and confidence, so evidence is assembled continuously, not reconstructed at quarter-end.
Which regulations?
Framework-agnostic, you map your own policies and obligations to processes: SOC 2, ISO 27001, FCA, or internal.
Prove process compliance without the quarter-end scramble
Stop reconstructing the answer every quarter.